Vlad Romance
This is my final project of the year. I hope you enjoy =]
This is my final project of the year. I hope you enjoy =]
In class we watched a part of Dreamworlds called ‘Ways of Looking’. The documentary discusses the way female artists are viewed in todays music videos. Music videos in contemporary music represent women as sexual objects. The way the camera captures them and paces their bodies reflects how men might look at them. The women themselves view their sexuality through the eyes of the male culture. We seem to live in a world that is dominated by the male way of looking. However this is not to say that in real life all women are looked at the same way. The sad thing is that music videos don’t show a different side of women. There is little focus on their individual personality and the things that separate the artist. Instead female artists are trapped in the pornographic gaze. I hope that one day music videos can look beyond a female artists sexuality and focus more on their individual nuances that make them so unique.
The film “Precious” is based on the book “Push”, a story of a young black girl who is abused by her mother and is pregnant with her second child. The story is very shocking since most people do not have to deal with so much stress. However, once we look past the initial situation we realize that maybe this story is a racial stereotype. Maybe this was not done on purpose, but the universal struggle and dreams to succeed are present. Its just the way that the movie is executed makes us believe that the situation Precious faces is a common one in black families.
According to Felicia Lee, writer for the New York Times, mainstream news media and serious critics ignored other black culture films because they were not “negative enough”. However I do not believe that mainstream culture looks to paint black culture in a negative light. Much has changed since the civil rights movements of the 1960s and to me it seems somewhat ridiculous that “Precious” had to incorporates so many stereotypes. But I do not believe it gained more popularity because of these stereotypes. To me the main story is about a young overweight girl who is trying to live like anyone else and overcome all odds to become successful. What better represents the fight for the American dream?
Stanley Kubrick, the widley known film director died in 1999 during the filming of his film Eyes Wide Shut. He was the director for many famous films like 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), and Full Metal Jacket. At the time of his death his most controversial film was A Clockwork Orange (1971). According to an interesting article on Kubrick and his films, called, Whats it going to be then eh?: Questioning Kubrick’s Clockwork, Kubrick depicts a world of sex and ultra-violence in A Clockwork Orange. Movies from the 60s and 70s were high in doses of violence and sex. Kubrick directed the ultraviolent A Clockwork Orange as a satire of societies acceptance of suck explicit material.
A Clockwork Orange was so explicit that it not available in England after its withdrawl in 1974. After reading the article on Kubrick and watching the movie it is clear that Kubrick aimed at making A Clockwork Orange a psychosexual and ultraviolent film. The film begins with the brutal beating of a homeless man followed by a scene at a “milk-bar” where there are sculptures of nude women in risky positions. However these scenes are not established just because the are explicit but just like in real life, violent and sexual symbols are all around us.
The main character of the film, Alex, resembles societies obsession with violence and sex even though it is much more clear in the actual film. But there is one question that the film brings to mind. Is society accepting of sex and violence because society teaches us to be, even after establishing a clear code of conduct and morality?
Macdougal, Stuart. “”Whats it going to be then eh?”: Questioning Kubricks Clockwork.” Cambridge University Press 1.1 (2003): 1-16. Web. 21 Mar 2010.
To Errol Morris photography is a very influential and effective device. Whether a photo was digitally altered or not does not take away from it’s impact. Errol Morris argues that altered photographs can be just as realistic as a real photograph. He uses examples like the “Irani Missles” photo and the satellite photos that sparked the Iraq War to prove his point. Even though these photographs were mislabeled or photoshopped their impact remains. Whether there are four missiles or three missiles the threat still remains and in the end that is what matters most.
This photograph was published in 2004 after the Tsunami tragedy in Asia. This photo is one of many fakes that were published after the 2004 Tsunami. This photo in particular may have not been photoshopped but is mislabeled. What you are looking at in this photo is not a shot of the real 2004 Tsunami but a predicted tidal bore that occurred in Thailand in 2002. Even though this photo is a fake it was published in newspapers all over the world.
This photograph supports Errol Morris’s argument in “Photography As A Weapon”. Though the photo is a fake, the photo still has an impact on the viewer when labeled “2004 Tsunami”. The people running away and the huge tidal wave in the background portrays fear. The viewer is thus able to catch a glimpse of the real Tsunami that occurred in 2004. The fact that many fake photos like these were used to represent the 2004 tsunami show that the public’s reaction to these photos were still very real.
Picture: “Saigon Execution” 1969 by Edward Adams
As I was browsing through the Pulitzer Prize Photo Exhibit “Saigon Execution” immediately stood out to me. The composition of the photo directs the viewers eyes right to the situation. The General’s arm acts as leading lines that point the viewer to the pistol and then to the prisoner. The viewer instantly understands what is happening in this picture just because of leading lines. Also, Edward Adams used a low f-spot to get a shallow-depth of field. This effect blurs the background of the picture but keeps the foreground sharp and detailed. This picture also incorporates the rule of thirds perfectly. Each subject in the picture is designated one third of the picture while the General’s arm takes up the middle third. The leading lines makes the transition from the left third to the right third seamless.
This photo is charged with political meaning. The photo was taken during the Vietnam War and symbolizes the war’s extreme brutality. This picture could support the peace movement that was widely popular during Vietnam. However, Adam’s views his photo differently. He asks, “How do you know you would’nt have pulled the trigger yourself?.” Adams really tries to capture the extreme pressure and emotion that one feels in a war setting. In my opinion it is one of the greatest representations.
This Camel Lights advertisement is a very successful one. The advertisement reminds me of fun times with friends because it . The ad successfully makes one believe that if they smoke Camel Lights they will have a fun time. The Camel ad creates a powerful illusion of reality. Since the Camel in the ad is having fun the potential consumer may have the illusion that he/she will also have fun when smoking Camel Lights. The advertisement does not rely on any background knowledge making it very easy for the consumer to accept it. Camel uses this type of ad in many of their advertisements. Camel incorporates their ‘camel’ character into most of their advertisements. By looking at the ‘camel’ character one can tell that Camel is targeting a young adult audience. Overall this is a really successful ad because it implements elements that give the audience an illusion of fun and enjoyment without distracting from the product.
This cWc advertisement is an example of a bad print advertisement. The visual elements are not very strong and do not remind the potential consumer of anything other than the product. However, cWc seems to make the consumer believe that their product is good for any occasion. This advertisement applies to the principle of ‘visuals are conveyed through both form and content’. Since the advertisement is very simple and straightforward it is easy to tell that it was designed to be conveyed in a simple manner. This advertisement requires no background or historical knowledge. cWc usually makes more interesting ads that portray the mood of their products. Unfortunately this ad is one that does not successfully convey a good mood or convince the potential consumer.
I decided to visit the Hirshorn last Monday. Since it was a weekday it was not very crowded. However, the Hirshorn seems to attract a diversity of people; parents and children, students, young artsy folk and elder art seekers alike.
Some parents encouraged their children to look at the art from different angles. The children particularly liked the pieces of art that “play tricks on your eyes”. They would run the entire length of the artwork and then one of them would stare at the center while the other stared from an angle. If the painting or sculpture met his/her standard of interest they would proceed to laugh and grin. If not they continued their art seeking. The young adult crowd was very engaged with the art. The young adults held conversations about the art while touching on personal ideas. But by just observing people’s reactions and conversations it is too difficult to reveal a person’s profession.
After reading Berger’s “Way of Seeing”, the idea of “cultural mystification” remains a mystery in my visit at the Hirshorn. However, the culture of an era and what a painting represents at the time it was created may differ if someone from another era observed it. Thus culture is constantly changing and those who observe art from a different culture experience “cultural mystification”. This mystification captures all types of people’s attention and draws the observer in.